Independent · Not affiliated with NHTSA or any automaker MethodologyData sourcesData refreshed Oct 6, 2026

Suzuki Esteem Problems, Recalls and MPG by Year

What this means

NHTSA lists 1 recall campaign across the Suzuki Esteem, 1995–2002. Owners have filed 121 complaints with NHTSA. Of the last 8 model years with settled counts, the 2000 drew the most (26) and the 1996 the fewest (5).

Data summary generated from official records. Methodology Data: NHTSA, DOT, EPA · Refreshed Oct 6, 2026

Suzuki Esteem complaints by model year

121 owner complaints filed with NHTSA. Red numbers above the columns are recall campaigns for that model year.

19951996199719981999200020012002
ComplaintsStill collecting reports3Recall campaigns

Counts are owner reports, not failure rates. Higher sales years tend to draw more reports. Source: NHTSA ODI, retrieved Oct 6, 2026.

Fewest complaints

  • 1996 · 5 complaints
  • 2002 · 5 complaints
  • 1997 · 7 complaints

Most complaints

  • 2000 · 26 complaints
  • 1998 · 24 complaints
  • 2001 · 21 complaints

Among the last 15 model years at least five years old; newer years are left out because owners are still filing reports. Every year compared →

Problem areas by model year

Complaints that name each component, 1995–2002. Darker cells mean more reports. One complaint can name several components.

Suzuki Esteem owner complaints by component and model year (NHTSA ODI)
Component19951996199719981999200020012002
Structure 102749102
Suspension 20164850
Service brakes 83322110
Engine and engine cooling 21004431
Air bags 11062200
Power train 21012210
Electrical system 11210020
Steering 10021111

Source: NHTSA ODI owner complaints, retrieved Oct 6, 2026.

Suzuki Esteem recalls (1)

Recall campaigns NHTSA lists for at least one Esteem model year, newest first.

NHTSA recall campaigns for the Suzuki Esteem
CampaignFiledWhatModel yearsRepaired
03V223000Jun 16, 2003SUZUKI/FMVSS 212/WINDSHIELD MOUNTING2002—

Only NHTSA and your automaker know whether your specific car was repaired. Open a model-year page for each campaign's official text, or check your VIN on NHTSA.

Check on NHTSA ↗

Fuel economy by model year

199626–29 mpg
199726–29 mpg
199826–29 mpg
199925–29 mpg
200026–29 mpg
200126–29 mpg
200225–27 mpg

EPA combined mpg range across engine and transmission configurations. Your mileage will vary. Source: EPA, retrieved Oct 6, 2026.

Where to next

Suzuki Esteem FAQ

How many recalls has the Suzuki Esteem had?

NHTSA lists 1 recall campaigns that cover at least one Suzuki Esteem model year from 1995 to 2002. Each campaign card on the model-year pages has NHTSA's official text and the repair completion rate. Only NHTSA's VIN lookup can tell you whether a specific car was repaired.

Which Suzuki Esteem year has the most complaints?

Among the last 8 model years with settled counts, the 2000 drew the most owner complaints filed with NHTSA (26) and the 1996 the fewest (5). Counts are owner reports, not failure rates, and sales volume affects them.

What are the most common Suzuki Esteem problems?

Across the 1995–2002 model years, owners most often name the structure, suspension, service brakes in complaints filed with NHTSA.

What mpg does the Suzuki Esteem get?

EPA rates the 2002 Suzuki Esteem at 25 to 27 mpg combined, depending on engine and transmission.

How this page was madeSources, processing, limits, review and changes

Processing

  • Complaints are counted per component. One complaint can list several, so component totals add up to more than the total.
  • Fuel cost = miles per year ÷ EPA combined mpg × EIA weekly price for your region.

Limitations

  • Complaint counts are owner reports, not verified findings or failure rates. There is no sales denominator.
  • Recall campaigns are listed for the model year. Only NHTSA and the automaker know whether a specific car was repaired.
  • Recent model years are still collecting reports.

Review

Data compiled automatically from the official files listed here.

Changelog

  • 2026-10-06 Data refreshed from the official files.
Was this page useful?Report a data error